Skip to main content

Main Area

Main

26 worst states for singles

1/
Jim Cheney // Shutterstock

Worst states for singles

When you’ve done all you can to put yourself out there —downloading the hottest dating apps, frequenting the trendiest bars, finding that perfect haircut — dating can feel like a fruitless endeavor. But what many tend to forget is how much location and economy plays into a successful dating pool. In the end, much of it is a numbers game — the more single people you meet, the higher the chances you’ll find a match. The more affordable activities like seeing a movie and grabbing a meal are available, the more likely people will be motivated to participate in the dating scene. When it comes to dating, not all places are created equal.

To identify the worst states for singles looking for love, Stacker looked to WalletHub’s 2017 Best and Worst Cities for Singles, which ranked all 50 states and the District of Columbia “across 23 key indicators of dating-friendliness.” These indicators included factors such as “economics,” “fun and recreation,” and “dating opportunities.” Here are the bottom 26 states in the country — where riding off into the sunset may be a bit more of a long shot.

2/
12019 // Pixabay

#26. Massachusetts

Total score: 44.0

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 18.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank34.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank15.0

3/
12019 // Pixabay

#25. Michigan

Total score: 43.4

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 13.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank26.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank43.0

4/
12019 // Pixabay

#24. Missouri

Total score: 42.6

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 29.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank18.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank24.0

5/
Fotocitizen // Pixabay

#23. Virginia

Total score: 42.5

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 17.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank20.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank35.0

6/
12019 // Pixabay

#22. Ohio

Total score: 42.3

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 20.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank23.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank32.0

7/
12019 // Pixabay

#21. Maine

Total score: 41.9

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 46.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank21.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank3.0

8/
12019 // Pixabay

#20. Indiana

Total score: 41.5

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 25.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank14.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank36.0

9/
Makalu // Pixabay

#19. Georgia

Total score: 40.9

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 14.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank38.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank41.0

10/
12019 // Pixabay

#18. New Jersey

Total score: 39.5

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 23.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank29.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank37.0

11/
12019 // Pixabay

#17. Oklahoma

Total score: 39.2

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 33.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank13.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank40.0

12/
12019 // Pixabay

#16. North Carolina

Total score: 38.9

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 27.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank24.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank38.0

13/
12019 // Pixabay

#15. Connecticut

Total score: 38.6

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 36.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank45.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank17.0

14/
Jennifer // Flickr

#14. Kansas

Total score: 38.1

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 28.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank12.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank49.0

15/
Good Free Photos

#13. Rhode Island

Total score: 37.8

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 43.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank39.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank12.0

16/
wezlo // Pixabay

#12. Delaware

Total score: 37.3

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 45.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank22.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank22.0

17/
USA-Reiseblogger // Pixabay

#11. Louisiana

Total score: 37.2

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 41.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank28.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank31.0

18/
12019 // Pixabay

#10. Maryland

Total score: 37.1

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 31.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank27.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank39.0

19/
12019 // Pixabay

#9. Tennessee

Total score: 36.5

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 39.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank32.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank33.0

20/
dennisflarsen // Pixabay

#8. South Carolina

Total score: 35.8

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 44.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank25.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank29.0

21/
keiblack // Pixabay

#7. New Mexico

Total score: 35.7

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 30.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank36.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank46.0

22/
emilyd3 // Pixabay

#6. Kentucky

Total score: 33.8

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 42.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank31.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank44.0

23/
Schmid-Reportagen // Pixabay

#5. Alaska

Total score: 33.6

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 49.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank43.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank21.0

24/
12019 // Pixabay

#4. West Virginia

Total score: 30.6

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 47.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank47.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank34.0

25/
12019 // Pixabay

#3. Arkansas

Total score: 28.8

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 50.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank41.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank48.0

26/
12019 // Pixabay

#2. Alabama

Total score: 28.7

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 48.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank33.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank50.0

27/
Goodfreephotos_com // Pixabay

#1. Mississippi

Total score: 25.9

‘Dating opportunities’ rank: 51.0

‘Dating Economics’ Rank42.0

‘Romance & Fun’ Rank51.0

2018 All rights reserved.